Software development team structure, what is right for you

The structure of a software development team will play a significant role in the success of a project. Every team member has their part to play and if there is not an effective structure in place, the project could face complexities and challenges. According to Standish Group’s 2020 CHAOS report, around 66% of software projects fail. The reasons vary however that is a staggering number. One way to avoid this is by ensuring the right software development team structure for your business goals and end product requirements.

Here we will look at the multiple software development team structure approaches so you can find the right approach for your project.

The generalist structure

The generalist structure consists of team members having a broad level of skills, expertise and experience in multiple software development fields. However, they do not possess any specialist skills that may be required to gain a deeper understanding to inform a better overall end product.  

The pros of generalist structure

• The team are aware of all aspect of software development; therefore, they know the product on a surface level.
• Each member can carry out their relative tasks without dependency on others.

The cons of the generalist structure

• Lack of specialist skills means there are no deep expertise within the team which can mean there may be blind spots that the team misses whether that is with functionality or the UX.
• There may be a need to hire and onboard new members of the team to fill the skills gap, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Specialist structure

The specialist structure consists of team members who have rich specialist skills and expertise in their niche. Each member will be an expert in their field, therefore will work on their specified area. This is often the structure most software development teams will opt for to build a high-performing software product.

The pros of the specialist structure

• Skills to build a high-performance and quality software product
• Highly level of knowledge and expertise

The cons of the specialist structure

• There may be a lack of collaboration as each member may work independently
• Lack of communication between team members could pose challenges with gaps

Hybrid team structure

The hybrid software development team as you can guess is a mixture of both a generalist and specialist team structure. This is often the most effective in building a high-performing software development team that can build software to meet organisation goals and requirements.

The pros of a hybrid team structure

• Best of both worlds with broad software skills and specialist skills
• Can fill any gaps presented by the other two structures
• A better, high-quality end product 

The cons of a hybrid team structure

• Can be costly to build this team structure
• Communication can be a challenge with multiple approaches to what works best

Ardent software engineering teams

Our expert software engineers with decades of experience are well-trained in world-leading software technologies as such Angular, Python, .Net, Rails, Flutter, Xamarin, React and much more. If you are looking for a team to come on board to help bring your vision to life, we can help. Whether you need an additional resource to complement your in-house existing skills or need a team to deliver the entire software, we can accommodate your needs. Get in touch to find out more or explore our software engineering team service.

The ardent software engineering teams can assist with all three software development team structures:

• The generalist structure – you have the product knowledge, and we have the software engineers that have expertise in numerous niches and fields within software development.
• The specialist structure – Our software engineers are well versed in delivering a wide variety of projects with the core components in mind; communication, timelines and budget.
• Hybrid team structure – We can bring the expertise to your existing knowledge to deliver a premium quality end product in a cost and time-efficient way.  

---